Net Worth

$385KTop 42%

PeakWorth

$4.2M+$182K

FI Age

50y 1m-11mo

2 min

See your Work Optional Date

SneakPeak
Comparisons Decision

PeakWorth™ vs a Robo-Advisor (Betterment / Wealthfront) — Auto-Investing vs an Actual Plan

Robo-advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront are genuinely great at one job: cheaply auto-managing a diversified portfolio for ~0.25%/yr. The job they don't do is planning — they never tell you the dated year you can stop working. That's the half PeakWorth owns.

Key facts

Robo fee

~0.25%/yr (Betterment / Wealthfront)

Robo strength

Automated portfolio management

PeakWorth strength

Dated FI Age + lifetime projection

Cost on $250k

~$625/yr (robo) vs $119.88/yr (PeakWorth)

What a robo-advisor genuinely does well

Betterment and Wealthfront solved a real problem: most people shouldn't hand-pick funds or rebalance by hand. For ~0.25%/yr they auto-build a diversified, low-cost index portfolio, rebalance it, reinvest dividends, and run tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts. If your question is 'who should manage the money,' a robo-advisor is a great at that for a fraction of a 1% human-advisor fee.

For a hands-off investor who just wants money invested sensibly and left alone, that's a legitimately good deal — and far cheaper than the traditional AUM advisor model.

The gap: a robo manages the portfolio, it doesn't make a plan

Auto-investing answers 'how should the money be invested.' It does not answer the questions a plan exists to answer: What year can I actually retire? Does buying this house push it back? Can we afford a kid and still hit FI by 50? What happens to my timeline in a 40% crash or a layoff? Betterment's and Wealthfront's built-in 'retirement' tools mostly return a success-probability dial for age 65 — not a dated, decision-ready answer.

  • No dated FI Age — robos return a probability, not the calendar year work becomes optional
  • No buy-vs-rent, bonus-allocation, or debt-payoff decision modeling
  • Limited dual-income household modeling (separate incomes, accounts, and goals)
  • Quarterly-ish framing, not an instant re-run the day a real decision comes up
  • The 0.25% fee still scales with your balance, even though the planning work doesn't

When using both makes sense

These are complementary, not competing. The stack most of our users land on: keep your assets at a robo advisor like Betterment or Wealthfront for the auto-management piece, and use both that and PeakWorth together — PeakWorth as the always-on plan that turns the balance the robo grows into a dated FI Age. You get cheap automated investing AND a real projection, instead of paying a 1% human advisor for both.

How PeakWorth turns a robo-advisor balance into a dated FI Age

A robo-advisor's dashboard tells you what you own and a rough 'on track / off track' read for 65. PeakWorth takes that same balance — plus your income, savings rate, and goals — and runs a year-by-year deterministic projection to age 95, with federal + state taxes, account-ordering, employer match, Social Security, and inflation.

The output isn't a probability dial; it's your FI Age — the specific calendar year your portfolio reaches ~25× the expenses it must cover after Social Security — roughly 20× your total annual expenses. You see the dated year work becomes optional and exactly how each decision moves it, while your robo keeps quietly managing the money in the background.

PeakWorth vs Betterment vs Wealthfront — head to head

The robos own auto-management; PeakWorth owns the dated plan. Figures are typical published rates — confirm current terms on each provider's site.

PeakWorth
Betterment
Wealthfront
Annual fee
Flat $119.88/yr (~$9.99/mo), independent of balance
~0.25%/yr of assets (Digital tier)
~0.25%/yr of assets
Account minimum
$0 — doesn't custody assets
$0 (Digital)
$500
Automated portfolio management
No — it's the planning layer, not a custodian; it doesn't trade or rebalance
Yes — auto-builds & rebalances a diversified index portfolio
Yes — auto-builds & rebalances a diversified index portfolio
Tax-loss harvesting
N/A — doesn't manage the assets
Yes (taxable accounts)
Yes (taxable accounts)
Retirement output type
Dated FI Age — the calendar year work becomes optional, plus a year-by-year projection to age 95
On-track read / success probability for ~age 65
On-track projection (Path) for ~age 65
Decision modeling (buy-vs-rent, bonus, debt payoff)
Yes — the Decision Hub scores each major decision's dollar-and-year impact
No
Limited
Dual-income household modeling
Yes — first-class (separate incomes, accounts, and goals)
Limited
Limited
Data export
Yes — CSV import/export of your data
Limited — statements & tax forms
Limited — statements & tax forms
Personalized to YOU

See exactly how this changes YOUR PeakWorth™ and FI Age

Generic articles can only go so far. PeakWorth runs every scenario against your real income, expenses, and goals — so you see the dollar-and-year impact of every decision before you make it.

Run it through PeakWorth

Frequently asked questions

Do Betterment and Wealthfront do financial planning?

Lightly. They auto-manage your portfolio and offer a basic 'are you on track for 65' projection, usually as a success probability. They don't return a dated FI Age, model a home purchase or a baby, or score a buy-vs-rent decision — that's the planning layer PeakWorth adds on top.

Is a robo-advisor's 0.25% fee worth it?

For hands-off investors, often yes — it's far cheaper than a ~1% human advisor and you get automated rebalancing and tax-loss harvesting. The fee buys management, not planning. Many users keep the robo for management and add PeakWorth (a flat $119.88/yr) for the plan, rather than paying a 1% advisor for both.

Can I use PeakWorth and a robo-advisor together?

Yes — that's the recommended setup. Keep your money invested at Betterment or Wealthfront for the auto-management, and use PeakWorth as the plan that projects your dated FI Age and scores your big decisions. They're complementary layers, not substitutes.

Betterment vs Wealthfront — which should I pair with PeakWorth?

Either works; they're close. Both auto-manage diversified index portfolios at ~0.25%/yr with tax-loss harvesting. Pick on cash features, account types, and UI preference — then point PeakWorth at the combined balance for the projection. PeakWorth is agnostic about where the assets actually sit.

Does PeakWorth manage my investments like a robo does?

No — and that's deliberate. PeakWorth doesn't custody assets, trade, or rebalance. It's the planning and projection layer. That separation is why the robo's ~0.25% (or a low-cost broker) plus PeakWorth's flat fee can be both cheaper and more capable than a 1% all-in-one advisor.

Why not just trust the robo's retirement projection?

Because it answers a narrower question. A robo's projection is typically a probability for a fixed age 65 on the assets it manages. PeakWorth runs your full picture to age 95 with taxes, account-ordering, and Social Security and returns the actual calendar year you hit ~25× the expenses it must cover after Social Security — roughly 20× your total annual expenses — then re-runs instantly when a real decision (job, home, bonus) comes up.

If you liked this, keep exploring

Calculators, true-cost pages, and audience playbooks across the PeakWorth network.

Ready to model this against your real numbers?

PeakWorth is the financial decision engine for households — your Personal Financial Strategy OS, a real-time engine that calculates every decision's impact on your future. The Decision Hub, an AI advisor, and a live projection that show you exactly how each move shapes your wealth and your FI Age.